IFS versus stock...

Suspension, Brakes, Tires, Wheels steeringetc..
User avatar
fosh69
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 744
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Firestone
State: CO
Location: Firestone, Colorado

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by fosh69 »

Yes, yes... it has been discussed many times how effective the solid front axle is. I absolutely agree about the simplicity and ruggedness of the stock setup. I also agree that is one reason why OTR trucks still use it. The bigger factor, though, is the tremendous load capability of the straight axle... in the trucking world it's all about how much you can move on a dime. For those owners adventurous enough, the IFS is a practical solution to the modern roadways and traffic situations. Upgraded brakes and handling is a must when everyday cruising speeds average above 60mph. Those same adventurous folks might be more inclined to use their trucks for more than redundant work-a-day tasks.
4eye 69

OO\===/OO

User avatar
PatS
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:59 am
City: Calgary, AB, CANADA
State: Foreign
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by PatS »

wedgehead wrote:These are old pics. I have better ones but I can't downsize them.


Ernie


This popular free program will resize your pics. Easy to use.
http://www.irfanview.ca/

I've been using it for about 5 yrs now...good product.

User avatar
PatS
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:59 am
City: Calgary, AB, CANADA
State: Foreign
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by PatS »

George wrote:If I wanted Ifs I would get a newer truck.
The drawback about new trucks, at least for me, is all the complicated unnecessary electronics, sensors and solenoids and crap that comes with the IFS :shame
There isn't one area that I can't comfortably tackle the diagnosis and repair of on the old Dodge.
Can't say that about a new electric truck.

Take the old Dodge, make a few creature comfort modifications and you have the good parts of new without the electrics :clap
1949 Chrysler Royal Coupe
1949 Chrysler Windsor Parts Car
1956 Nash Rambler Custom
1962 Dodge D300
1975 Champion Motorhome on Dodge Chassis
2000 Dodge Caravan



One day we're here
The next we're gone
We always take for granted
That we wake at dawn.

mopargnome
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 142
Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 11:34 am
City: Chino Valley
State: AZ
Location: Chino Valley, Arizona

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by mopargnome »

I just installed a 77 D-200 frame clip on my 64 D-200 Crew Cab. I also replaced the 3/4 ton springs with 1/2 ton springs. I got to get the cab back on it but it sits nice and low, which is what I want. Cant wait to get it back on the road and drive it! :dance
1964 D-200 Crew Cab- current project
1989 Shelby Dakota- for sale
1983 Ramcharger 2wd- almost a driver
1986 Ramcharger 2wd- next project
1966 Ford Mustang- weekend cruiser

magnumcharger
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 62
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2007 8:20 pm
City: Tracyville, New Brunswick
State: Foreign

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by magnumcharger »

I'm currently installing a Crown Vic IFS into my 1969 Fargo 100 Sweptline. I'll be posting a thread here soonly about the entire process, and how it can be done.
Attachments
DSC07374.JPG

User avatar
rapidtransitrick
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 5:33 pm
City: richmond
State: IL
Contact:

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by rapidtransitrick »

Can't wait to see
http://fordodgetrucksonly.forumotion.com/

http://ridesbydesign.com/index.html

https://www.facebook.com/ridesbydesign
USN RETIRED

User avatar
POWWAG
Founding Member
Founding Member
Posts: 991
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Maple Valley
State: WA
Location: Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by POWWAG »

Lots of pix

User avatar
Roxyflash
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 6:47 pm
City: East Moline
State: IL

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by Roxyflash »

IFS is for the car ride on a truck really??I can take my Dodge on a on or off ramp and go around it at over 50 mph and never squeal the front wheels.It also wears the tires even this is on my 1970 using 275/60/15 tires.Another nice thing if you have to pull the oil pan theres all the room in the world to drop it.The KISS theory keep it simple stupid !!!! :shame
Sweptline Owner From Age 16 to Present

User avatar
rapidtransitrick
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri May 14, 2010 5:33 pm
City: richmond
State: IL
Contact:

Re: IFS versus stock...

Post by rapidtransitrick »

we all have our own ideas,needs and wants. thats all there is to it. one day clunker bill will wake up again and your carburater will be out lawed and so will out dated suspension. or you license plates will be so use restricted that you will only be able to pull your classic up and down on the trailer, and nothing else. installing modern power plants,better brakes and up dated suspensions could help avoid this and make it a better and safer vehicle. i like the idea of the independent front suspension
http://fordodgetrucksonly.forumotion.com/

http://ridesbydesign.com/index.html

https://www.facebook.com/ridesbydesign
USN RETIRED

Post Reply