4 wheel parasitic loss
-
- Sweptline.ORG Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:25 pm
- City: Apopka
- State: FL
4 wheel parasitic loss
What would you guys say the parasitic loss factor (transfer case etc.)for a 4 wheel drive truck versus a 2 wheel drive? In a percentage? For instance, same motor, same trans, weight everything - the only difference is 2 wheel versus 4 wheel. What's a good percentage number to use?
1966 D-100
1973 Plymouth Roadrunner
2006 SRT-8 Magnum
2005 SRT-10 Viper Ram
1973 Montgomery Ward Mini Bike
1973 Plymouth Roadrunner
2006 SRT-8 Magnum
2005 SRT-10 Viper Ram
1973 Montgomery Ward Mini Bike
- surfnuke9
- Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:51 am
- City: Churchton
- State: MD
- Location: Churchton, MD
Re: 4 wheel parasitic loss
as far as mileage?
I would say 10 percent.
I would say 10 percent.
Tim
1971 W200 383 4-spd Utiline/long bed
1971 W200 383 4-spd Utiline/long bed
-
- Sweptline.ORG Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:25 pm
- City: Apopka
- State: FL
Re: 4 wheel parasitic loss
Sorry, horsepower/torque to the pavement. And there may not even be a statistical number that is accepted. I guess a better way to ask would be - how much "load" does the 4wheel drive assembly "take away" from the power/torque of an engine. (In theory). There's the add for the extra weight too.
1966 D-100
1973 Plymouth Roadrunner
2006 SRT-8 Magnum
2005 SRT-10 Viper Ram
1973 Montgomery Ward Mini Bike
1973 Plymouth Roadrunner
2006 SRT-8 Magnum
2005 SRT-10 Viper Ram
1973 Montgomery Ward Mini Bike
- nfury8
- Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
- Posts: 2443
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- City: KC, MO
- Location: Kansas City
- Contact:
Re: 4 wheel parasitic loss
Could depend on the transfer case. I would imagine the gear driven 205 is the worst and a chain drive would be better.
71 D100 Adventurer SE - PowerWagon conversion
70 W200 CrewCab - Urban Assault Kiddie Hauler
69 Plymouth Fury III Convertible - Pro Touring Machine
69 Plymouth Fury III Convertible - Beater, Hiding in a cave
70 W200 CrewCab - Urban Assault Kiddie Hauler
69 Plymouth Fury III Convertible - Pro Touring Machine
69 Plymouth Fury III Convertible - Beater, Hiding in a cave
-
- Sweptline.ORG Member
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 1:25 pm
- City: Apopka
- State: FL
Re: 4 wheel parasitic loss
I would concur with Tim on 10% for fuel mileage. But I had a chevy guy tell me that power loss (drag) due to transfer case, weight, etc. is around 25%. Apples to oranges sure, but I could not believe it. Just wondering what you fellas thought.
1966 D-100
1973 Plymouth Roadrunner
2006 SRT-8 Magnum
2005 SRT-10 Viper Ram
1973 Montgomery Ward Mini Bike
1973 Plymouth Roadrunner
2006 SRT-8 Magnum
2005 SRT-10 Viper Ram
1973 Montgomery Ward Mini Bike
- surfnuke9
- Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
- Posts: 1119
- Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 9:51 am
- City: Churchton
- State: MD
- Location: Churchton, MD
Re: 4 wheel parasitic loss
I would bet its close to the same for power loss. Its just gears or a chain after all....not much loss there as compared to an automatic trans.
Tim
1971 W200 383 4-spd Utiline/long bed
1971 W200 383 4-spd Utiline/long bed
Re: 4 wheel parasitic loss
O loss because of Tcase. on pavement you are in 2 wheel drive and no gears are turning in the Tcase/ so the only factor sucking power is the 1000 plus pounds of extra weight and the fact the the shoe box shape of a sweptline is harder to push when it is 6 or 8 inches higher off the ground than a D-series.
I concur with the 10% guess. in later trucks with full time higher than 10% for sure.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)