Page 3 of 3

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 5:05 pm
by Wildergarten
Stubs68 wrote:
Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:29 pm
So it kinda looks like a NP201 but is really a split stick NP205. Works well and I retained the twin stick look. :lol:
Very cool! How do you intend to do a shifter boot for the twin stick?

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:04 pm
by Wildergarten
Stubs68 wrote:
Mon Sep 14, 2020 4:29 pm
Now the fun part. I really do like the look of the twin stick transfer case that my truck had originally so I decided to get a split rail kit and add the twin sticks back on. So it kinda looks like a NP201 but is really a split stick NP205. Works well and I retained the twin stick look. :lol:
One thing about the twin stick: These trucks originally did not have 2WD-Low because the driveline was not designed to tolerate the engine delivering 2X torque to the rear axle alone. If you are planning to run 2WD-Low (I am), an upgrade to the Spicer 1430 style yokes (if I recall the number correctly :study ) may be in order. If you got a '69+ NP-205, I believe that has the 30 spline output shaft, which makes that driveline upgrade a LOT easier to do.

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:09 pm
by Stubs68
Thanks for the additional info. Have not gotten that far along in my build to answer what I will or will not be using the truck for. Currently thinking I will just drive around town. Especially if I put any money into the paint job.As for the shifter boot I got a new twin stick boot form a for bronco resale parts place. Fits and looks good.

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 5:04 pm
by Wildergarten
Stubs68 wrote:
Tue Sep 15, 2020 3:09 pm
As for the shifter boot I got a new twin stick boot form a for bronco resale parts place. Fits and looks good.
Now that's not fair. :shame If you find what you learned here useful, then please provide the manufacturer's part number and contact info.
It's one of those corporeal culture thingies. :Thumbsup

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Tue Sep 15, 2020 7:58 pm
by Hobcobble
Great idea. :Thumbsup

John

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:55 am
by Stubs68
Ok here you go: I was able to split my shift rails on the 205 using a shift rail kit (see info below). Got the twin boot from same place. Hope this helps.

JB Custom Fabrication <https://jb-custom-fabrication.myshopify.com/>
jonb@jbfab.net
NP205 shift rails - Dodge (NP C-97801)
Shifter boot - twin stick with boot ring $26.50

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 12:37 pm
by Wildergarten
Stubs68 wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 11:55 am
Shifter boot - twin stick with boot ring $26.50
Thanks, I sent them a note.
Here is a thread on the NP201 twin stick proposition as background: https://www.sweptline.org/forums/viewto ... 83#p301983

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:15 pm
by PwrWgnDrvr
The twin stick boot is cool, but won't work with the stock NP201 setup due to the sticks locking together in 4 low. Modify the sticks to work at your own risk/peril.

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 2:00 pm
by Wildergarten
PwrWgnDrvr wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:15 pm
Modify the sticks to work at your own risk/peril.
Which I did: https://www.sweptline.org/forums/viewto ... 95#p302195

Since that photo was taken, I lengthened the shaft such that I have the 1/2" Stronghold wanted.

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:52 pm
by PwrWgnDrvr
PwrWgnDrvr wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:15 pm
The twin stick boot is cool, but won't work with the stock NP201 setup due to the sticks locking together in 4 low. Modify the sticks to work at your own risk/peril.
That was directed to the masses, not u specifically Mark. We already know what, why and how u did what u did to modify yours. Just didn't want someone with a stock setup to think those boots would work.

Re: NP201 v. NP205

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2020 8:56 pm
by Wildergarten
PwrWgnDrvr wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 3:52 pm
PwrWgnDrvr wrote:
Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:15 pm
Modify the sticks to work at your own risk/peril.
That was directed to the masses, not u specifically Mark.
Which was appropriate. Nor was offense taken. I just wanted others to have reference to what was found, done, and why, particularly because I have snapped a u-joint in 2X-Low on the old truck. It's still not done, but it's close. Other aspects of the project will have priority until it rains.