64 D100... what to do...

This area is for open discussion about anything..."KEEP IT CLEAN"
User avatar
soopernaut
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 8952
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Des Moines,IA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by soopernaut »

Gigabitdrew wrote:
PwrWgnDrvr wrote:61-68 will have all the correct stuff to convert your truck to a W the easiest. U will need to replace that torched crossmem if u go back to a std trans.
Thank you.... good to know.
Since you want to go with an automatic, I'm thinking a later truck will be better for a donor. All 61-68 4wd trucks were manuals. A later truck equipped with the engine, transmission, axle ratios you want will put you ahead rather than trying to piece it all together. You can also get factory front power disc brakes and power steering off the donor truck.

User avatar
Gigabitdrew
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:10 am
City: Starkville
State: MS

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Gigabitdrew »

soopernaut wrote:Since you want to go with an automatic, I'm thinking a later truck will be better for a donor. All 61-68 4wd trucks were manuals. A later truck equipped with the engine, transmission, axle ratios you want will put you ahead rather than trying to piece it all together. You can also get factory front power disc brakes and power steering off the donor truck.
Agreed.. but HOW much newer? I don't want a computer to control everything, but I like the idea of fuel injection, electronic ignition, power steering and breaks, but a solid straight front axle... still want 4x4 conversion.

Thinking a 3/4 ton donor... Like an early 90's model W250?

am I way off my rocker?

-gig
1964 D100 - Yard Art Today, Transportation Tomorrow
1964 W200 - No, two is not an addiction

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14583
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Hobcobble »

PwrWgnDrvr wrote:61-68 will have all the correct stuff to convert your truck to a W the easiest. U will need to replace that torched crossmem if u go back to a std trans.
To further Terry's point....
If you could locate a '61-'68 W100 donor and a short tail shaft small block 727 tranny, you
could build a decent truck with an automatic. :idea :Thumbsup Most all the parts you'd
need can be had new or used. Front brake drums from '61 through '72 are the same. The
rear brake drums should be the same from '61-'71. :study :thinking Some of the axle
and t-case parts can be had from Dave Cirillo in Vancouver, WA
http://www.jobrated.com

Basically, you'd just be swapping over your body parts onto the donor frame. Before ANY
of this is done though, you should check with your state DMV as to the legality of using a
donor frame. If that isn't legal, you'd need to transfer the suspension/drive line parts over
to the current frame.
John

User avatar
soopernaut
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 8952
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Des Moines,IA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by soopernaut »

Gigabitdrew wrote: Agreed.. but HOW much newer? I don't want a computer to control everything, but I like the idea of fuel injection, electronic ignition, power steering and breaks, but a solid straight front axle... still want 4x4 conversion.

Thinking a 3/4 ton donor... Like an early 90's model W250?

am I way off my rocker?

-gig
72-93 trucks are all similar and built on the same frames. They have the solid front axle. 72-74 have drum brakes and 75-79 are full time 4wd. Electronic ignition can be added easily to any age of truck, but Dodge had them earlier than most in 72. Power Steering and brakes were available on all 72-93 trucks.
1988 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 318. 1989 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 360. The Magnum 5.2 came out in 92 and the Magnum 5.9 came out in 93. All the FI engines use a computer and I believe the lean burn trucks also used a computer but it can be removed. You will have to pick what is most important to you.

nytemuvr
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 915
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:49 pm
City: Rio Linda
State: CA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by nytemuvr »

soopernaut wrote:
Gigabitdrew wrote: Agreed.. but HOW much newer? I don't want a computer to control everything, but I like the idea of fuel injection, electronic ignition, power steering and breaks, but a solid straight front axle... still want 4x4 conversion.

Thinking a 3/4 ton donor... Like an early 90's model W250?

am I way off my rocker?

-gig
72-93 trucks are all similar and built on the same frames. They have the solid front axle. 72-74 have drum brakes and 75-79 are full time 4wd. Electronic ignition can be added easily to any age of truck, but Dodge had them earlier than most in 72. Power Steering and brakes were available on all 72-93 trucks.
1988 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 318. 1989 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 360. The Magnum 5.2 came out in 92 and the Magnum 5.9 came out in 93. All the FI engines use a computer and I believe the lean burn trucks also used a computer but it can be removed. You will have to pick what is most important to you.
Check this from Wikipedia about electronic ignition systems...I thought Mopar had the first production ones myself...The first electronic ignition (a cold cathode type) was tested in 1948 by Delco-Remy,[3] while Lucas introduced a transistorized ignition in 1955, which was used on BRM and Coventry Climax Formula One engines in 1962.[3] The aftermarket began offering EI that year, with both the AutoLite Electric Transistor 201 and Tung-Sol EI-4 (thyratron capacitive discharge) being available.[4] Pontiac became the first automaker to offer an optional EI, the breakerless magnetic pulse-triggered Delcotronic, on some 1963 models; it was also available on some Corvettes.[4] The first commercially available all solid-state (SCR) capacitive discharge ignition was manufactured by Hyland Electronics in Canada also in 1963. Ford fitted a Lucas system on the Lotus 25s entered at Indianapolis the next year, ran a fleet test in 1964, and began offering optional EI on some models in 1965.[4] Beginning in 1958, Earl W. Meyer at Chrysler worked on EI, continuing until 1961 and resulting in use of EI on the company's NASCAR hemis in 1963 and 1964

User avatar
Gigabitdrew
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:10 am
City: Starkville
State: MS

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Gigabitdrew »

soopernaut wrote:
Gigabitdrew wrote: Agreed.. but HOW much newer? I don't want a computer to control everything, but I like the idea of fuel injection, electronic ignition, power steering and breaks, but a solid straight front axle... still want 4x4 conversion.

Thinking a 3/4 ton donor... Like an early 90's model W250?

am I way off my rocker?

-gig
72-93 trucks are all similar and built on the same frames. They have the solid front axle. 72-74 have drum brakes and 75-79 are full time 4wd. Electronic ignition can be added easily to any age of truck, but Dodge had them earlier than most in 72. Power Steering and brakes were available on all 72-93 trucks.
1988 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 318. 1989 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 360. The Magnum 5.2 came out in 92 and the Magnum 5.9 came out in 93. All the FI engines use a computer and I believe the lean burn trucks also used a computer but it can be removed. You will have to pick what is most important to you.
So, it sounds like a 1992-93 W250 with a Magnum engine may be an appropriate donor for my 64... and if they use the same frame then hopefully I would have minimal items needing fabrication, right? The wheelbase is not the same for the SWB truck as it is mine 114", and it is 115" for the 81-93. I'm curious if anyone knows someone who has done this conversion...

I appreciate all the feedback.

-gig
1964 D100 - Yard Art Today, Transportation Tomorrow
1964 W200 - No, two is not an addiction

User avatar
soopernaut
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 8952
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Des Moines,IA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by soopernaut »

Gigabitdrew wrote:
soopernaut wrote:
Gigabitdrew wrote: Agreed.. but HOW much newer? I don't want a computer to control everything, but I like the idea of fuel injection, electronic ignition, power steering and breaks, but a solid straight front axle... still want 4x4 conversion.

Thinking a 3/4 ton donor... Like an early 90's model W250?

am I way off my rocker?

-gig
72-93 trucks are all similar and built on the same frames. They have the solid front axle. 72-74 have drum brakes and 75-79 are full time 4wd. Electronic ignition can be added easily to any age of truck, but Dodge had them earlier than most in 72. Power Steering and brakes were available on all 72-93 trucks.
1988 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 318. 1989 was the 1st year for FI in trucks with the 360. The Magnum 5.2 came out in 92 and the Magnum 5.9 came out in 93. All the FI engines use a computer and I believe the lean burn trucks also used a computer but it can be removed. You will have to pick what is most important to you.


So, it sounds like a 1992-93 W250 with a Magnum engine may be an appropriate donor for my 64... and if they use the same frame then hopefully I would have minimal items needing fabrication, right? The wheelbase is not the same for the SWB truck as it is mine 114", and it is 115" for the 81-93. I'm curious if anyone knows someone who has done this conversion...

I appreciate all the feedback.

-gig
The 72-93 trucks do not use the same frame as the 61-71 trucks. Also you are not going to find a 115" wheelbase W250. They did not make them. You make it sound like a 1 inch difference in wheelbase is a huge difference. Nobody would even notice.

User avatar
Gigabitdrew
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:10 am
City: Starkville
State: MS

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Gigabitdrew »

soopernaut wrote:The 72-93 trucks do not use the same frame as the 61-71 trucks. Also you are not going to find a 115" wheelbase W250. They did not make them. You make it sound like a 1 inch difference in wheelbase is a huge difference. Nobody would even notice.
OK.... so not the same frame... and then probably not the best of ideas. Also, seems like someone else also said there were no swb W250 trucks....

Body swap with a 1992 D250 and forget about 4wd for now, or get an older 1968 w200 and worry about upgrading the components as I go?

Thought?

-gig

I'm slow sometimes, but I am learning. :-)
1964 D100 - Yard Art Today, Transportation Tomorrow
1964 W200 - No, two is not an addiction

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14583
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Hobcobble »

Gigabitdrew wrote:
soopernaut wrote:The 72-93 trucks do not use the same frame as the 61-71 trucks. Also you are not going to find a 115" wheelbase W250. They did not make them. You make it sound like a 1 inch difference in wheelbase is a huge difference. Nobody would even notice.
OK.... so not the same frame... and then probably not the best of ideas. Also, seems like someone else also said there were no swb W250 trucks....

Body swap with a 1992 D250 and forget about 4wd for now, or get an older 1968 w200 and worry about upgrading the components as I go?

Thought?

-gig

I'm slow sometimes, but I am learning. :-)
Apart from a pre-'69 W100, there are no 8 lug axle truck options with a wheelbase you could use.
You need to keep in the 114" +/- neighborhood unless you feel like shortening a longer wheelbase
frame. The '61 through '68 W100 Sweptlines were 114" wheelbase trucks with 3/4 ton axles.
Here's an example.....
http://easttexas.craigslist.org/cto/4821970050.html
John

User avatar
Gigabitdrew
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:10 am
City: Starkville
State: MS

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Gigabitdrew »

Hobcobble wrote:Apart from a pre-'69 W100, there are no 8 lug axle truck options with a wheelbase you could use.
You need to keep in the 114" +/- neighborhood unless you feel like shortening a longer wheelbase
frame. The '61 through '68 W100 Sweptlines were 114" wheelbase trucks with 3/4 ton axles.
Here's an example.....
http://easttexas.craigslist.org/cto/4821970050.html
John
I did not know this.... thank you!

That is not a bad truck on Craigslist either.

-gig
1964 D100 - Yard Art Today, Transportation Tomorrow
1964 W200 - No, two is not an addiction

User avatar
lightning4x4
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:25 pm
City: cave junction
State: OR

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by lightning4x4 »

as one who has built several "frankentrucks" and several where 2wd to 4wd thats a lot of work time and money .this is just my opinion ,but after reading everyone else's response I feel ,if your heart is set on a v8/auto find a decent running vehicle that has your motor and trans rebild your front end / brakes and fun driving it . if your set on 4x4 find something with the same type of frame (same year range) modifying older body to newer frame is NOT easy. the last frankentruck I built had 4 donor trucks and took 5 years to build(money has away of stretching out a build)these days I prefer to rebuild what the truck already has . if it were me ,id go big block 2wd ,good luck and have fun with it .

User avatar
Gigabitdrew
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:10 am
City: Starkville
State: MS

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Gigabitdrew »

lightning4x4 wrote:as one who has built several "frankentrucks" and several where 2wd to 4wd thats a lot of work time and money .this is just my opinion ,but after reading everyone else's response I feel ,if your heart is set on a v8/auto find a decent running vehicle that has your motor and trans rebild your front end / brakes and fun driving it . if your set on 4x4 find something with the same type of frame (same year range) modifying older body to newer frame is NOT easy. the last frankentruck I built had 4 donor trucks and took 5 years to build(money has away of stretching out a build)these days I prefer to rebuild what the truck already has . if it were me ,id go big block 2wd ,good luck and have fun with it .
Yeah.... I'm leaning that way more and more...

As someone who has done a lot of these, if I said I wanted to put in a 318 would you go with an old school LA motor or an EFI Magnum?

-gig
1964 D100 - Yard Art Today, Transportation Tomorrow
1964 W200 - No, two is not an addiction

sdenty
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:36 pm
City: Buena Park
State: CA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by sdenty »

I am doing a 1995 5.2 Magnum swap in a 1964 with the 518 od trans(2wd).Not as hard as you may think. I got a complete factory harness with computer at a local self service yard from a 95 van for 40 dollars on half off day, then bought a factory service manual($9.95 on Ebay) and deleted all the unnecessary wiring(abs,etc).Took about 2 nights of tracing wiring. Or you might van to look for a running B van and use the drivetrain and harness. Modifying the trans cross member was easy, notched and welded in 1/4 inch plate with stock 95 trans mount used. Engine mounts are stock 1964 and bolt right up to the 95 5.2(using the lower holes on your frame mounts(upper holes are for /6).Hope this helps, good luck, and have fun.

sdenty
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:36 pm
City: Buena Park
State: CA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by sdenty »

Also 1 more thing, if you use a 1994 fuel rail it has the fuel pressure regulator on the rail.1995 has the regulator in the fuel tank .

sdenty
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:36 pm
City: Buena Park
State: CA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by sdenty »

here is the drivetrain mounted
the motor in the frame mounted done.jpg

User avatar
Gigabitdrew
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:10 am
City: Starkville
State: MS

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Gigabitdrew »

sdenty wrote:Also 1 more thing, if you use a 1994 fuel rail it has the fuel pressure regulator on the rail.1995 has the regulator in the fuel tank .
So, if my donor is a 95 or better, then take the tank... right? I think that is what you are saying... that was my plan for whatever my donor is... as I want to move the old tank or of the cab.

any other pointers? I haven't done work on my own car is nearly 25 years, but I am looking forward to getting this project moving.

-gig
1964 D100 - Yard Art Today, Transportation Tomorrow
1964 W200 - No, two is not an addiction

sdenty
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 273
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:36 pm
City: Buena Park
State: CA

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by sdenty »

95 or newer get the tank to simplify.

User avatar
lightning4x4
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2011 6:25 pm
City: cave junction
State: OR

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by lightning4x4 »

if you want simple easy i'd go la318 but if you want fuel mileage newer technology is the way to go but its a lot more work . and involves computers .if your not good with computers in vehicles go old school .

User avatar
Jake66
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:23 pm
City: Phoenix
State: AZ

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Jake66 »

just throwing in my :2cents if your up for doing some modification, my plan is to take a disc brake front axle with leaf springs form a 78 and adapt the axle to my original leaf front suspension, then adapt the steering column to the power steering associated with it, once its mounted, then figure out all the drive shaft measurements and location for the t case while still having a truck that will drive just no 4x4 till i mount the t case and drive shafts.

doing it this way will allow you to use any motor you want, keep your original frame and in my opinion save time and money versus doing a complete body swap.
1966 Dodge D100 Custom SC SWB
Bermuda Turquoise
And
White

User avatar
Gigabitdrew
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2014 9:10 am
City: Starkville
State: MS

Re: 64 D100... what to do...

Post by Gigabitdrew »

Jake66 wrote:just throwing in my :2cents if your up for doing some modification, my plan is to take a disc brake front axle with leaf springs form a 78 and adapt the axle to my original leaf front suspension, then adapt the steering column to the power steering associated with it, once its mounted, then figure out all the drive shaft measurements and location for the t case while still having a truck that will drive just no 4x4 till i mount the t case and drive shafts.

doing it this way will allow you to use any motor you want, keep your original frame and in my opinion save time and money versus doing a complete body swap.
I like that plan... I've been intentionally staying away from the mid 70s donors because of lack of knowledge and thoughts of full-time 4wd... wouldn't that front axle have a limited slip diff? I have more reading to do, but I appreciate the feedback and thoughts.

-gig
1964 D100 - Yard Art Today, Transportation Tomorrow
1964 W200 - No, two is not an addiction

Post Reply