No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Wiring, lights, heater controls, anything electrical..
Post Reply
User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by riffraff »

First time I've had an issue with my charging system. I've not reading any ammeter changes, and I'm not charging. I do have battery voltage at the alternator post, but no voltage increase at the post while revving. Looks like my wiring was changed to heavier gage, but still like the upper diagram (and no fuse links). Anyway, no amp readings (lights on/off, etc) and no charging. Truck starts and runs fine, otherwise. I did replace my ignition switch a couple months ago, but didn't notice any issues.

Ideas on what to check?

Thanks!

Image

Image
Image
Last edited by riffraff on Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:40 am, edited 3 times in total.
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading

Post by riffraff »

Just pulled the dash apart and near as I can tell, it looks like the upper diagram, with heavier wire. Wired with 8ga from the the alternator direct to the ammeter and also 8ga from the ignition relay to the ammeter. There is also a 16ga, or so, wire going to the same "charge" side of the ammeter as does the alternator. No additional wire to the "discharge" side of the ammeter.
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

712edf
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:46 pm
City: Wichita Falls
State: TX
Location: wichita falls,texas

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by 712edf »

I am not familiar with 60's systems, but I suspect the ammeter itself has become "open", meaning no current is flowing through it.
Easiest way to tell is to disconnect the wires to it & check for continuity between the 2 posts with an Ohmmeter.

Sorry that I can't be of more help.

Bucky
1966 W500
1975 W600
1978 W200 club cab

PwrWgnDrvr
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by PwrWgnDrvr »

Check the regulator too.

User avatar
MadMC63
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 794
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 12:16 pm
City: Rome
State: GA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by MadMC63 »

I believe you will find this RamchargerCentral post helpful.

http://ramchargercentral.com/electrical ... ng-system/
1971 Dodge D100
So what's wrong with setting beneath a single pull string incandescent light bulb writing angry letters?

User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by riffraff »

Thanks for the replies. I'm going to wire around the ammeter first and see what that gets me, swap the regulator next.

Per the diagram, seems I shouldn't have power to the rest of the truck, if the ammeter were open. And if the it were just the ammeter open, seems I should still read some output on the alternator, itself.
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

712edf
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:46 pm
City: Wichita Falls
State: TX
Location: wichita falls,texas

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by 712edf »

riffraff wrote:Thanks for the replies. I'm going to wire around the ammeter first and see what that gets me, swap the regulator next.

Per the diagram, seems I shouldn't have power to the rest of the truck, if the ammeter were open. And if the it were just the ammeter open, seems I should still read some output on the alternator, itself.

I think the ammeter has power to BOTH sides, one from the alt (if its working) & the other side from the Batt. Ammeter indicates/measures direction of flow (Alt>Batt = Charge, Batt>Alt = Discharge) and amount/rate of flow. On 70's trucks an open ammeter prevents alternator from charging Battery I think. I may be incorrect though.
Yes you should be able to read output on alternator itself regardless of ammeter functioning.

I think you have the right plan, bypass ammeter then swap regulator.

Bucky
1966 W500
1975 W600
1978 W200 club cab

PwrWgnDrvr
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 7339
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by PwrWgnDrvr »

Ammeter is fine. It is telling u the system isn't working. Most likely regulator, but can be alternator too.
Test by running a wire from the battery + terminal to alternator field lug. If ammeter does not show a massive charge, then the alternator is bad. If it does, then the regulator is bad.

Not sure how the hacks to the original wiring would affect this, since I only see half of the schematic. I dont consider the hacks an "upgrade".

712edf
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:46 pm
City: Wichita Falls
State: TX
Location: wichita falls,texas

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by 712edf »

MadMC63 wrote:I believe you will find this RamchargerCentral post helpful.

http://ramchargercentral.com/electrical ... ng-system/
Good post!

Bucky
1966 W500
1975 W600
1978 W200 club cab

User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by riffraff »

PwrWgnDrvr wrote:Ammeter is fine. It is telling u the system isn't working. Most likely regulator, but can be alternator too.
Test by running a wire from the battery + terminal to alternator field lug. If ammeter does not show a massive charge, then the alternator is bad. If it does, then the regulator is bad.

Not sure how the hacks to the original wiring would affect this, since I only see half of the schematic. I dont consider the hacks an "upgrade".
Good call :salut

I wired around the regulator, as you suggested, and the ammeter jumped..yay!

I was getting thrown that the ammeter wasn't showing a discharge. I think even with the bad VR, as the current is still passing through the ammeter to the accessories, it should show a neg reading.

But, I think I have that figured out now, which goes to your point of questionable "upgrades." There was an additional solenoid added for a trailer supply, and the original ammeter lead at the bulkhead (#16), is jumped to the hot post of the solenoid. Not sure I would ever show a discharge, as wired. There is a smaller lead on the alternator side of the VR. No idea what that is feeding, but that is probably the only thing that will force a discharge reading--assuming it is wired to something.

As to the simple diagram I posted above (which I pulled from this site), in looking at it closer, the lower "upgrade" sample, maybe close to how mine is wired, is pretty much useless, and would allow charging/discharging in a loop around the ammeter.

The below is the 1969 factory schematic, in case anyone following this thread in the future needs help:

http://www.sweptline.com/tech/69wire.jpg

That my VR looks newish, suggests it's been a problem in the past. I went ahead and ordered a electronic "look-alike" VR, from ebay, below:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mopar-Voltage-R ... Mi&vxp=mtr

Thanks for everyone's input!
Last edited by riffraff on Sat Dec 10, 2016 10:56 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by riffraff »

Good discussion of the proper upgrade in this thread. Looks like terminals #16 and #27 should have been jumped, in my case. Going to have to see if my under-dash wiring has been buggered much.

Edit: trying to figure out what good the depicted 16 to 27 jumper is. Seems it would just bypass the ammeter (like I have now). Hum.

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=34877&hilit=charging&start=20

Pic of the upgrade:

Image
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

712edf
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 4019
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:46 pm
City: Wichita Falls
State: TX
Location: wichita falls,texas

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by 712edf »

Every Dodge I ever owned seems to have had the wiring boogered up by a previous owner.

Bucky
1966 W500
1975 W600
1978 W200 club cab

coelcanth
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 205
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 2:49 pm
City: Brooklyn
State: NY

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by coelcanth »

i recently had a problem with my charging system and it turned out to be the rectifier diodes in the alternator itself.

the nice thing about it all was that i could visually diagnose the problem because the part was physically broken apart,
and my local alternator shop had the parts on the shelf to fix it up.
i was able to rebuild myself and get back on the road in about an hour.

these guys have lots of rebuild and upgrade parts for our charging systems too:
http://store.alternatorparts.com/daimlerchrysler.aspx

looks like you still have the original style round back alternator and mechanical regulator installed.

User avatar
my5thmopar
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1002
Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 8:51 pm
City: Columbia
State: TN

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by my5thmopar »

Upgrade to an electronic regulator. I got one on fleabag in the old style case. Voltage is rock study. Craig

User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by riffraff »

my5thmopar wrote:Upgrade to an electronic regulator. I got one on fleabag in the old style case. Voltage is rock study. Craig
Yep, that's exactly what I've ordered. Once it's up and charging, I'm going to figure out the previous owner's hack.
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

User avatar
pwadventurer
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Saylorsburg, Pa.

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by pwadventurer »

riffraff wrote:Good discussion of the proper upgrade in this thread. Looks like terminals #16 and #27 should have been jumped, in my case. Going to have to see if my under-dash wiring has been buggered much.

Edit: trying to figure out what good the depicted 16 to 27 jumper is. Seems it would just bypass the ammeter (like I have now). Hum.

viewtopic.php?f=21&t=34877&hilit=charging&start=20

Pic of the upgrade:
It looks to me like the Red 27 wire from the ammeter feeds the fuse link into 16 block. This protects the circuit that feeds the splice and onto the fuse block and ammeter. What's not shown in the FSM is the Black # 16 wire from the splice going onto the other side of the ammeter. If the black 16 wire does go onto the ammeter there would be a small amount of current flowing through the ammeter. Without it there, no current flow through it. What do you think?
70 dodge alternator adaptation_zpsmuwf9pqa.JPG

User avatar
pwadventurer
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 353
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Saylorsburg, Pa.

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by pwadventurer »

Seems to me Dodge fell short in the alternate wiring adaptation in the FSM. Instead of putting the fuse link between the 27/16 block (which is quick and easy), they should have put it between the alternator charge side of the ammeter terminal and the black # 16 wire to the splice and fuse block.(in series with).This would have eliminated all 27/16 load problems with those terminal connections at the firewall.

User avatar
PwrWgnWalt
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Butte
State: MT

Re: No Charging, No Amp Reading 1969 W100

Post by PwrWgnWalt »

For anyone else reading this post, see the following link, Topic #9
viewtopic.php?f=21&t=34977

The factory-used alternator-ammeter wiring is a great system, as is depicted above. :study
1971 W200: green, built 360/NP435 4-spd, daily driver, 4.10 gears
1971 D100: "Dude" Super Banana Yellow, 318/727
1970 D100: Adventurer Sport, Red, 318/727, AC, pb, extra fuel tanks, and aluminum tailgate trim - all factory original.
1970 D200: light blue, 383/NP435 4-speed, 4.10 gears
1970 D200: Crewcab, brown, 318/727, pb, short Utiline box, Dana 60 (rear), 4.10 ratio gears
1969 W200: Crewcab, yellow, 440/435 4-speed, pb, short Utiline box, HD Dana 44 (front), Dana 60 (rear) 4.88 gears
1969 D100: Adventurer, brown, 383/727, pb, extra fuel tanks
1969 D100: Adventurer, medium blue, LA-318/727
1966 W200: Green, A-318/NP435 4-speed, NP201 Trxfr Case, 4.10 gears Powr Lok rear
1965 D200: Crewcab, turquoise, A-318/727 dash shift, Sweptline box
1964 W200: Green, A-318/NP435 4-speed, NP201 Trxfr Case, 4.10 gears Powr Lok rear

Post Reply