So I was Wondering?
- wide65
- Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
So I was Wondering?
I want a 3" lift on my 2WD....... 1965 I was wondering will stock springs for a 4WD work or will that be too much lift? what about pulling the leafs off a 80's ram?
- JACKISBACK
- Sweptline.ORG Member
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- City: SOUTHEASTERN CT
- State: CT
- Location: GROTON CT 06340
- Contact:
SPRINGS
69 TO 93 REAR SPRINGS ARE THE SAME
DRIVE A HYBRID,, MORE GAS FOR ME !!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lOhABpUFumk
- wide65
- Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: SPRINGS
JACKISBACK wrote: 69 TO 93 REAR SPRINGS ARE THE SAME
what's the difference from 65 to 69?
- OregonDodgeboy
- Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
- Posts: 1398
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- City: Nampa, Idaho
- Location: Nampa, Idaho
- Contact:
Mu 66 was lifted about 3" when it was on the stock frame. Looked like a pre-runner,... kinda. They used the old-fashioned lift blocks, but I think they are unsafe on the front axle. I think it's time you talked to a spring shop. Or hit the wrecking yards and start measuring.
Jeff Easterbrook
66 D100 440/727 on 72 IFS chassis
67 W200 440/4-sp. Resting
76 IH Scout II
81 MB 240D
http://www.jeasterbrook.usana.com
Frame swap Q & A guy
66 D100 440/727 on 72 IFS chassis
67 W200 440/4-sp. Resting
76 IH Scout II
81 MB 240D
http://www.jeasterbrook.usana.com
Frame swap Q & A guy
- wide65
- Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
- Posts: 1487
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
OregonDodgeboy wrote:Mu 66 was lifted about 3" when it was on the stock frame. Looked like a pre-runner,... kinda. They used the old-fashioned lift blocks, but I think they are unsafe on the front axle. I think it's time you talked to a spring shop. Or hit the wrecking yards and start measuring.
I am about to...... I was just asking the question in hopes!!!