Intake manifolds

Engine, transmission, rear-end, driveline, fuel system etc..
Post Reply
User avatar
Mavis13
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Prescott,AZ
Location: Prescott, AZ

Intake manifolds

Post by Mavis13 »

My intake manifold is shot. My question is I found a torker 2 its for a 340 will this fit and work on my 318? I know there both small blocks but thats about all I know. And also for power what would be better dual plane manifold or single? and what makes them diffrent?
1968 Dodge D100 LA 318, 1972 Plymouth Fury 3

712edf
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 4041
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 8:46 pm
City: Wichita Falls
State: TX
Location: wichita falls,texas

Re: Intake manifolds

Post by 712edf »

Most will say that a dual plane is better for torque, which is the lower rpm power that you need in daily driving, accelerating, etc. Single planes are considered best for top end power, wide open throttle, running from the law down the interstate type of driving.

It has been said that the "Torker" name is a misnomer, being that other Edelbrock manifolds (dual plane) make more usuable torque than the Torker. I don't know how the I & II versions differ. I run an original Torker on my 440 w/o any problems.

Bucky
1966 W500
1975 W600
1978 W200 club cab

Rodger
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 2146
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: COS ( Colo )
Location: Colo Spgs

Re: Intake manifolds

Post by Rodger »

Mavis

The size of the In-Take Ports going into the heads of any 318 can be labeled
as a 1/2 inch hole.

The size of the In-Take Port leaving the LA-340 ( or LA-360 ) In-take Manifold
can be labeled as a 3/4 inch pipe diameter. You can see that it will bolt on,
but the air flow from the 3/4 " pipe to the 1/2" hole will be botttle necked
into a "ledge".

All the already given information on the Dual Plane being the better is very
true.

If you have not changed the Exhaust from the Exhaust Manifolds to a "dual
exhaust" already, you are wasting the benifit of using the 4 bbl Manifold and
the matching 500 CFM 4 bbl Carb.



Rodger & Gabby
COS
Rodger & Gabby Colo Spgs 47 De Soto S-11, Loaded 62 Imperial Crown Cpe w/62 Lic Plates, 63 Le Baron w/63 Lic Plates, 66 Le Baron, 70 W100 SWB Loaded Custom, 70 Overlander-Internatioal Dbl, 77 D Shorty 2 x 4, 360,NP, 12 bolt

User avatar
ozzie
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 435
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: colorado springs
State: CO
Location: colo. spgs. co.

Re: Intake manifolds

Post by ozzie »

I run a edelbrock streetmaster manifold, (single plane), and an edelbrock 1406 carb. with dual exaust. it is true that the low end torque is not as good as a dual plane, but on the highway it runs like a scalded ape, and pulls on hills with no bogging down. I am very happy with the performance on the top end, and i am not one to race stoplight to stoplight it fits my requirements nicely. Ozzie.
ozzie

User avatar
Mavis13
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 384
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Prescott,AZ
Location: Prescott, AZ

Re: Intake manifolds

Post by Mavis13 »

Awesome thank you guys I learned alot. I am running dual exhaust with no crossover just straight pipe. I decided to go with the edelbrock streetmaster intake because I like going fast :lol: I found one on ebay for $85 after shipping I picked it up for $102. Which is cheaper then any performer I could find. Thank you guys again.
1968 Dodge D100 LA 318, 1972 Plymouth Fury 3

Post Reply