Eddy Performer or Performer RPM for a Poly318?

Engine, transmission, rear-end, driveline, fuel system etc..
Post Reply
User avatar
MowagW200
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: 5417
State: Foreign
Location: Untersiggenthal and Steg im Toesstal, Switzerland
Contact:

Eddy Performer or Performer RPM for a Poly318?

Post by MowagW200 »

Dear Group
Aside of the membership in this forum, I'm member in the Poly318 forum of Yahoo as well. Now Steve L. got in contact with Edelbrock to ask about a Eddy Performer for a Poly318. The answer from the engineer of Edelbrock was that the tooling costs are about $20'000 and they would go to from the tooling if an order reaches 50 pieces.
For stock truck application a member of the Yahoo- forum recommends a Performer and Gary P. recommends a Performer RPM (e.g. Air Gap Performer RPM). Personally I would get an Eddy Performer RPM (Air Gap), because Ißm not really happy with the Weiand 7503 I'm running now for three years. I'm missing the low end torque with the Weiand (very big single plane plenum, very short intake runners).
The URL is http://autos.groups.yahoo.com/group/318poly/ if you could not get an original (stock) 4bbl intake manifold and would not convert a 2bbl to a 4bbl intake manifold.
Thanks a lot for your interest.

Original thread of Steve L.
> Dear Group: I had contacted Edelbrock about them possibly making a
> Poly Performer or Performer RPM intake. The engineer said it would
> cost them around $20,000 or more to tool this poly application.He did
> not think Edelbrock would be doing it soon in the future. Edelbrock
> would need a minimum order of fifty (50) poly intakes to make it worth
> their effort. The engineer also said what alot of the group have
> mentioned that to mill open the iron 2bbl intake for the Holley 500
> cfm 2bbl and have the ports "extrude honed and make a substantial
> amount of extra power. He would not comment on the Weiand 7503 intake
> or design except to say it needed alot of work.
>
> Thought I'd try.
>
> Steve L...
Dieter
Mowag W200, 318 A, 200 HP, 4.88 axle, NP 420 4 speed - 2281199520 (on the frame)
1956 Chrysler New Yorker Newport, 354 HEMI, 2 speed powerflite, N56L3495

Rodger
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 2146
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: COS ( Colo )
Location: Colo Spgs

Re: Eddy Performer or Performer RPM for a Poly318?

Post by Rodger »

Deiter

There is a way of getting better HP, Torque and Fuel Economy than what your A-318 engine came with.
Use NAPA's # 22599 muffler with the exhaust design attached below and your original exhaust manifolds.

Rodger & Gabby
COS

ps
For a learning experience, find out the exhaust design and muffler for the much newer V10 Dodge Truck's .
Attachments
Dual In-let Muffler From Oct 1966 MoPar Trk Parts Book.jpg
Rodger & Gabby Colo Spgs 47 De Soto S-11, Loaded 62 Imperial Crown Cpe w/62 Lic Plates, 63 Le Baron w/63 Lic Plates, 66 Le Baron, 70 W100 SWB Loaded Custom, 70 Overlander-Internatioal Dbl, 77 D Shorty 2 x 4, 360,NP, 12 bolt

MoparNorm
DTA Founder
DTA Founder
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Re: Eddy Performer or Performer RPM for a Poly318?

Post by MoparNorm »

There is a LOT better way than running that exhaust system, buy a set of the DTA Poly Headers....asDieter has already done...= )

Dieter, have you emailed Gary about his intake project?
It appears that Edelbrock is in no hurry.
I contacted BOTH Offenhauser and Holley, neither were interested in re-building their damaged molds for the Poly intakes that they made. The Offy is the best, it was a Dual Plane 360 design, perfect for trucks. I had one on a built 360, sure wished I had about 10 for a Poly, combined with the DTA Poly Headers they would kick some serious tail and provide better fuel economy at the same time.

User avatar
MowagW200
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: 5417
State: Foreign
Location: Untersiggenthal and Steg im Toesstal, Switzerland
Contact:

Re: Eddy Performer or Performer RPM for a Poly318?

Post by MowagW200 »

Norm, Rodger,
Thanks a lot for your lines. While removing the old cast exhaust manifolds a stud has broken. The result was to remove the whole top of my Poly318. I brought both cylinder heads to a machining shop to a) degrease it and remove the broken stud out of the thread /wo destroying the head or thread. Both worked.
After wards I brought both cylinder heads to a engine renovation company to put in unleaded fuel rings, new valve guides as well as new viton gaskets around the valve stems.
I put together every thing and started the engine with the DTA headers. To run the truck out of the garage to move it into another corner I put short, straight exhaust pipes and Flowmaster 50 behind. Sounds very well even though the exhaust system is far away from finished.

Norm, Yes I'm still in contact with Gary P. (where you got your valve train from I guess) and your warmly welcome hint was the reason to join the yahoo Poly318 interest group. E.G. there I read about an Aussi who put Poly heads to a LA block (only minor machining was necessary - I guess additional oil feeding and return lines) or at least two Poly stroker projects (324, 365 and 402 cid) with at least 390 HP (365, 402 cid) at less than 6000 rpm. So I personally thing a stroker Poly could outrange a stock big block with far better handling characteristics on the road (car and truck).

Kind regards, Dieter
Dieter
Mowag W200, 318 A, 200 HP, 4.88 axle, NP 420 4 speed - 2281199520 (on the frame)
1956 Chrysler New Yorker Newport, 354 HEMI, 2 speed powerflite, N56L3495

User avatar
MountainMoparRobin
Founding Member
Founding Member
Posts: 7854
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Lakewood
State: CO
Location: Lakewood Colorado

Re: Eddy Performer or Performer RPM for a Poly318?

Post by MountainMoparRobin »

Very, Very, interesting! I know of a Poly owner that is also looking at stroking it out to 402 ci. Haven't heard from him for awhile, not sure if the build up has started or not. :study

Post Reply