40 reasons why guns should be banned

This area is for open discussion about anything..."KEEP IT CLEAN"
DaveRoss
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Greensboro
State: NC
Location: Greensboro NC

40 reasons why guns should be banned

Post by DaveRoss »

1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, Detroit & Chicago cops need guns.

2. Washington DC's low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis' high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.

3. Statistics showing high murder rates justify gun control but statistics showing increasing murder rates after gun control are "just statistics."

4. The Brady Bill and the Assault Weapons Ban, both of which went into effect in 1994 are responsible for the decrease in violent crime rates, which have been declining since 1991.

5.We must get rid of guns because a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid.

6. The more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.

7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.

8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.

9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should "put up no defense - give them what they want, or run" (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die - People Do, 1981, p. 125).

10. The New England Journal of Medicine is filled with expert advice about guns; just like Guns & Ammo has some excellent treatises on heart surgery.

11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seat belts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for internal medicine, a computer programmer for hard drive problems, and Sarah Brady for firearms expertise.

12. The 2nd Amendment, ratified in 1787, refers to the National Guard, which was created 130 years later, in 1917.

13. The National Guard, federally funded, with bases on federal land, using federally-owned weapons, vehicles, buildings and uniforms, punishing trespassers under federal law, is a "state" militia.

14. These phrases: "right of the people peaceably to assemble," "right of the people to be secure in their homes," "enumerations herein of certain rights shall not be construed to disparage others retained by the people," and "The powers not delegated herein are reserved to the states respectively, and to the people" all refer to individuals, but "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" refers to the state.

15. "The Constitution is strong and will never change." But we should ban and seize all guns thereby violating the 2nd, 4th, and 5th Amendments to that Constitution.

16. Rifles and handguns aren't necessary to national defense! Of course, the army has hundreds of thousands of them.

17. Private citizens shouldn't have handguns, because they aren't "military weapons'', but private citizens shouldn't have "assault rifles'', because they are military weapons.

18. In spite of waiting periods, background checks, fingerprinting, government forms, etc., guns today are too readily available, which is responsible for recent school shootings. In the 1940's, 1950's and 1960's, anyone could buy guns at hardware stores, army surplus stores, gas stations, variety stores, Sears mail order, no waiting, no background check, no fingerprints, no government forms and there were no school shootings.

19. The NRA's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign about kids handling guns is propaganda, but the anti-gun lobby's attempt to run a "don't touch" campaign is responsible social activity.

20. Guns are so complex that special training is necessary to use them properly, and so simple to use that they make murder easy.

21. A handgun, with up to 4 controls, is far too complex for the typical adult to learn to use, as opposed to an automobile that only has 20.

22. Women are just as intelligent and capable as men but a woman with a gun is "an accident waiting to happen" and gun makers' advertisements aimed at women are "preying on their fears."

23. Ordinary people in the presence of guns turn into slaughtering butchers but revert to normal when the weapon is removed.

24. Guns cause violence, which is why there are so many mass killings at gun shows.

25. A majority of the population supports gun control, just like a majority of the population supported owning slaves.

26. Any self-loading small arm can legitimately be considered to be a "weapon of mass destruction" or an "assault weapon."

27. Most people can't be trusted, so we should have laws against guns, which most people will abide by because they can be trusted.

28. The right of Internet pornographers to exist cannot be questioned because it is constitutionally protected by the Bill of Rights, but the use of handguns for self defense is not really protected by the Bill of Rights.

29.Free speech entitles one to own newspapers, transmitters, computers, and typewriters, but self- defense only justifies bare hands.

30. The ACLU is good because it uncompromisingly defends certain parts of the Constitution, and the NRA is bad, because it defends other parts of the Constitution.

31. Charlton Heston, a movie actor as president of the NRA is a cheap lunatic who should be ignored, but Michael Douglas, a movie actor as a representative of Handgun Control, Inc. is an ambassador for peace who is entitled to an audience at the UN arms control summit.

32. Police operate with backup within groups, which is why they need larger capacity pistol magazines than do "civilians" who must face criminals alone and therefore need less ammunition.

33. We should ban "Saturday Night Specials" and other inexpensive guns because it's not fair that poor people have access to guns too.

34. Police officers have some special Jedi-like mastery over handguns that private citizens can never hope to obtain.

35. Private citizens don't need a gun for self- protection because the police are there to protect them even though the Supreme Court says the police are not responsible for their protection.

36. Citizens don't need to carry a gun for personal protection but police chiefs, who are desk-bound administrators who work in a building filled with cops, need a gun.

37. "Assault weapons" have no purpose other than to kill large numbers of people. The police need assault weapons. You do not.

38. When Microsoft pressures its distributors to give Microsoft preferential promotion, that's bad; but when the Federal government pressures cities to buy guns only from Smith & Wesson, that's good.

39. Trigger locks do not interfere with the ability to use a gun for defensive purposes, which is why you see police officers with one on their duty weapon.

40. Handgun Control, Inc., says they want to "keep guns out of the wrong hands." Guess what? You have the wrong hands.

:clap :usa :Thumbsup
Dave
'71 D100 225 /6
daily driver

User avatar
wideblock
Founding Member
Founding Member
Posts: 5617
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: las cruces nm
State: NM
Location: Las Cruces, New Mexico
Contact:

Post by wideblock »

i almost didnt read this because of the title. now im glad i didnt delete it :Thumbsup
Trey

1965 CSS Utiline.


ex trucks:
70 D100
66 d100
66 d100
67 d100
69 d100
69 d200 crew cab
65 crew cab
66 d100
66 d100


"i don't know it all, but i know enough to be dangerous"

sabbfan

Post by sabbfan »

I thought the same thing. Clicked on it ready to get angry.

User avatar
mopardwh
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 4356
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Longview
State: TX
Location: Back in the U.S.
Contact:

Post by mopardwh »

sabbfan wrote:I thought the same thing. Clicked on it ready to get angry.
Ditto.

I ordered a Walther P99 40cal last week. Pick it up Monday!!!!!!!! :dance :dance :dance
Doug

User avatar
motomatt383
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1952
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Durham, NC
State: NC
Location: durham,nc

Post by motomatt383 »

:goodpost i'm with those guys. i sat up straight in my chair ready to fire back at it.


matt
'70 D-100, Ruffin,plum crazy/wht top,5.2 magnum.
'70 Roadrunner
'40 Dodge coupe
http://community.webshots.com/user/motomatt383
http://www.myspace.com/70runner

User avatar
cowboy
Founding Member
Founding Member
Posts: 4233
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Alvin TX

Post by cowboy »

I think we all where ready to fire back at this , now a must read all the way :Thumbsup
:usa
cowboy Alvin Tx
67 w100 318 3spd
2005 Ram 2500 CC Diesel 4x4 lwb
LAND OF THE FREE
BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE

User avatar
menefreghista762
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Baytown
State: TX
Location: Texas
Contact:

Post by menefreghista762 »

Guns rock, all of them!
Image
[color=#FF0000]"Catfish"
64 W100 \6, np420, 4.10 SG, stick_WAR WAGON!!!
65 D200 318ci, stick-SOLD!
67 D200 318c, stick-SOLD!
"Once you pull the pin, Mr. Hand Grenade is no longer your friend[/color]

User avatar
wideblock
Founding Member
Founding Member
Posts: 5617
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: las cruces nm
State: NM
Location: Las Cruces, New Mexico
Contact:

Post by wideblock »

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! bad flash backs of the party days in baytown. great pic. LOL :Thumbsup
Trey

1965 CSS Utiline.


ex trucks:
70 D100
66 d100
66 d100
67 d100
69 d100
69 d200 crew cab
65 crew cab
66 d100
66 d100


"i don't know it all, but i know enough to be dangerous"

User avatar
OregonDodgeboy
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1398
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Nampa, Idaho
Location: Nampa, Idaho
Contact:

Post by OregonDodgeboy »

Yeah, I'm with you guys. I almost didn't read this because I knew I'd get riled up. But I feel that you can't keep your head in the sand either.

Opinion: When all the guns are removed from the hands of those that legally keep and use them, then only the criminals will have guns.

Fact: Canada did this not too long ago (IIRC), and the crime rate for armed home invasions went up over 300% in the first year. I didn't need to read through the rest of the stats in that article. :banghead

Fact: Someone famous once said, "An armed society is a polite society". The US Government is more affraid of a revolution than anything else. If we ever give up that right,... well,... God help us.
Jeff Easterbrook
66 D100 440/727 on 72 IFS chassis
67 W200 440/4-sp. Resting
76 IH Scout II
81 MB 240D

http://www.jeasterbrook.usana.com

Frame swap Q & A guy :Thumbsup

User avatar
duracell
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1151
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Peoria,Arizona
Location: Peoria, Arizona
Contact:

Post by duracell »

check it out he's got a blunt in the ashtray lol :joker
as always and sometimes not,steve

User avatar
OregonDodgeboy
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1398
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Nampa, Idaho
Location: Nampa, Idaho
Contact:

Re: 40 reasons why guns should be banned

Post by OregonDodgeboy »

I thought I'd post some comments about some of these individual statements.
DaveRoss wrote:1. Banning guns works, which is why New York, DC, Detroit & Chicago cops need guns.
If banning guns works,then the cops wouldn't need them either, don't ya think? :thinking
DaveRoss wrote:2. Washington DC's low murder rate of 69 per 100,000 is due to strict gun control, and Indianapolis' high murder rate of 9 per 100,000 is due to the lack of gun control.
I'm sure this has more to due with the extremely high crime rate in DC compared to Indy. Not to mention that in Indy there's probably alot of hunters and sportsmen there, rather than gangsta thugs.
DaveRoss wrote:3. Statistics showing high murder rates justify gun control but statistics showing increasing murder rates after gun control are "just statistics."
This is my personal favorite statement. I guess that only the stats that agree with banning guns are valid. :thinking :study
DaveRoss wrote:5.We must get rid of guns because a deranged lunatic may go on a shooting spree at any time and anyone who would own a gun out of fear of such a lunatic is paranoid.
And then we need to ban all cars, because some nutcase might drive it through a crowd of people and hurt someone. :thinking :withstupid
DaveRoss wrote:6. The more helpless you are the safer you are from criminals.
Yeah, criminals prefer unarmed suspects.
DaveRoss wrote:7. An intruder will be incapacitated by tear gas or oven spray, but if shot with a .357 Magnum will get angry and kill you.
Strange, i think those facts are backwards. A criminal with a bullet in his brain isn't likely to hurt you (or anyone else for tat matter). But if you try to shoo him off with Plegde or Pam, he's likely to hurt you.
DaveRoss wrote:8. A woman raped and strangled is morally superior to a woman with a smoking gun and a dead rapist at her feet.
Moral superiority? Please explain that concept to me.
DaveRoss wrote:9. When confronted by violent criminals, you should "put up no defense - give them what they want, or run" (Handgun Control Inc. Chairman Pete Shields, Guns Don't Die - People Do, 1981, p. 125).
What happens when that criminal becomes the Government and you have no way to defend your rights? Oh yeah, that "chain yourself to the mayor's office door" thing really works. :bs
DaveRoss wrote:11. One should consult an automotive engineer for safer seat belts, a civil engineer for a better bridge, a surgeon for internal medicine, a computer programmer for hard drive problems, and Sarah Brady for firearms expertise.
Yeah, and I always check with Hillary Clinton when I need advice about my Mercedes. :thinking

I'll stop here, mainly since I have to go to work today. If I had more time to spend, I could shoot down every one of these with facts, not just opinion. And Dave, I respect your right to have your opinion on this, so don't take it personal, but you might wanna see if Scott will delete this thread. You're losing tons of "street cred" right now I think.

:2cents
Jeff Easterbrook
66 D100 440/727 on 72 IFS chassis
67 W200 440/4-sp. Resting
76 IH Scout II
81 MB 240D

http://www.jeasterbrook.usana.com

Frame swap Q & A guy :Thumbsup

User avatar
Hemikuda71
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 787
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Oklahoma City
State: OK
Location: Oklahoma City

Post by Hemikuda71 »

Jeff, I don't think Dave is losing "street cred". I believe he's giv'n us more ammunition in the way of diluted so called facts at the way the anti-gun left looks at our rights, and I want to thank him for posting it for us all to read. :usa :goodpost
R/T
'61 D-100 Utiline
'62 D-100 SWB
'64 D-200 LWB CSS 1 of 2 known 3/4 ton CSS's
'68 A-100 Pick Up (stolen)
'72 Challenger
'78 "Lil Red Express"
'97 Dakota Club Cab

User avatar
cudajimmy
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1900
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Oklahoma
State: OK
Location: Norman, Oklahoma
Contact:

Post by cudajimmy »

From what I see in the upcoming elections in 2008, we need to start worrying. :2cents
69 Barracuda Notchback 440
61 D100 SWB Poly Auto
65 36' Chris Craft Constellation

User avatar
plydus340
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 236
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: marlow oklahoma

Post by plydus340 »

Theres too many of us ol rednecks to take our guns. Let's hear it for the rednecks!
P.S. I'll give up my gun when they pry it from my COLD, DEAD, HANDS!
1968 D100 727 383
1962 Polara 500 (project)
1973 Plymouth Duster 440 (FAST)

greenmountainchopper

Post by greenmountainchopper »

have to admit I rolled my eyes when I saw The title. but then felt great to read this one. As we say it up north LIVE FREE OR DIE !!! PS dont shoot till you see the whites of their eyes

DaveRoss
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Greensboro
State: NC
Location: Greensboro NC

Post by DaveRoss »

I knew I'd be preachin' to the choir here...It made me mad when I saw the title too! Then, the more I read the more I enjoyed it. :lol:

My idea of gun control has always been: Use BOTH hands.
Dave
'71 D100 225 /6
daily driver

DaveRoss
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 375
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Greensboro
State: NC
Location: Greensboro NC

Re: 40 reasons why guns should be banned

Post by DaveRoss »

OregonDodgeboy wrote:I'll stop here, mainly since I have to go to work today. If I had more time to spend, I could shoot down every one of these with facts, not just opinion. And Dave, I respect your right to have your opinion on this, so don't take it personal, but you might wanna see if Scott will delete this thread. You're losing tons of "street cred" right now I think.

:2cents
Hopefully by now you've realized it was a waste to 'shoot these down'.

Have you ever heard of satire, lampoonery or pasquinade?
Dave
'71 D100 225 /6
daily driver

User avatar
KTO
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Post by KTO »

duplicate post...sorry
Last edited by KTO on Mon Jan 22, 2007 1:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
KTO
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm

Post by KTO »

What happens if guns are banned and then everyone starts knocking over convenience stores with knives and bats?

Would hillary have to outlaw all sharp objects and the Red Sox???

I get the heeby jeebys every time I'm around someone who is rabid for gun control. Everything about them just screams "ENSLAVE ME PLEASE"

User avatar
CLIFF
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 385
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: ST LOUIS--MO

Post by CLIFF »

KTO wrote:I get the heeby jeebys every time I'm around someone who is rabid for gun control. Everything about them just screams "ENSLAVE ME PLEASE"
HAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHA.....I ALMOST FELL OUT OF MY CHAIR! :goodpost

Post Reply