truck stance

This area is for open discussion about anything..."KEEP IT CLEAN"
bigks3
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:05 pm
City: little rock
State: IA

truck stance

Post by bigks3 »

Is it just me or does it seem like the 68 and older 3/4 ton trucks sit higher in the air than 69 thru 71?

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14573
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: truck stance

Post by Hobcobble »

bigks3 wrote:Is it just me or does it seem like the 68 and older 3/4 ton trucks sit higher in the air than 69 thru 71?
The pre-'69 Ws do sit higher.
John

bigks3
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:05 pm
City: little rock
State: IA

Re: truck stance

Post by bigks3 »

why do they?

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14573
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: truck stance

Post by Hobcobble »

bigks3 wrote:why do they?
The rear lift blocks on '68 and earlier Ws are taller than
later Sweptlines. :2cents :study
John

PwrWgnDrvr
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 7370
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Re: truck stance

Post by PwrWgnDrvr »

bigks3 wrote:Is it just me or does it seem like the 68 and older 3/4 ton trucks sit higher in the air than 69 thru 71?
Are u asking about D's, W's or both?

bigks3
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:05 pm
City: little rock
State: IA

Re: truck stance

Post by bigks3 »

im asking about the w series. So its just the rear lift blocks? I want my 70 crew to sit as high as the pre 69s

User avatar
dodgeboykim
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 3018
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Chilliwack. B.C. Canada
State: Foreign
Location: chilliwack.

Re: truck stance

Post by dodgeboykim »

68 and older W's use higher lift blocks as you know and different spring pack in front to have higher stance.
My truck is younger than me.
66 W100. 70 D 500 , 69 Hiab Speed Loader. 96 Ram 3500 Club Cab Cummin's 5 spd. 97 Ram 1500 Club Cab 5.9 gas auto. 83 W200 LB Propane 360 auto 09 Yammy Rhino 700.

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14573
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: truck stance

Post by Hobcobble »

bigks3 wrote:im asking about the w series. So its just the rear lift blocks? I want my 70 crew to sit as high as the pre 69s
Keep an eye on the drive line / yoke angles as well as the run-out in the front and
rear drive shafts... :idea :2cents
John

User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

Re: truck stance

Post by riffraff »

bigks3 wrote:Is it just me or does it seem like the 68 and older 3/4 ton trucks sit higher in the air than 69 thru 71?
If you look at page 18 of the 1969 "Light-Duty Dodge Trucks" brochure, Dodge does say the 1969 W100, at least, sits lower:

"...the W100 displays a new LOWER PROFILE for sleeker appearance and easier entry and loading."


Download the 1969 Dodge Truck brochures here:
viewtopic.php?f=33&t=37948
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

User avatar
WD
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Rosemark
State: TN
Location: Lancaster Plantation

Re: truck stance

Post by WD »

Swap your W front springs out for a set of D front springs. Supposed to add a couple inches of lift. Then spend less than $20 at the nearest chain auto parts store on new rear blocks and u-bolts. I'm sure someone on here with a D series would trade springs straight across for a low cost front end lowering job. Running W springs on a D drops the front end roughly 3 inches.
If I didn't build it, it ain't mine.

1949 Dodge B1B-108; 1969 D100-128; 72 Super Beetle; and a bunch of others...

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14573
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: truck stance

Post by Hobcobble »

WD wrote:Swap your W front springs out for a set of D front springs. Supposed to add a couple inches of lift. Then spend less than $20 at the nearest chain auto parts store on new rear blocks and u-bolts. I'm sure someone on here with a D series would trade springs straight across for a low cost front end lowering job. Running W springs on a D drops the front end roughly 3 inches.
Are you sure of this? :thinking
John

User avatar
WD
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 1741
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Rosemark
State: TN
Location: Lancaster Plantation

Re: truck stance

Post by WD »

Hobcobble wrote:
WD wrote:Swap your W front springs out for a set of D front springs. Supposed to add a couple inches of lift. Then spend less than $20 at the nearest chain auto parts store on new rear blocks and u-bolts. I'm sure someone on here with a D series would trade springs straight across for a low cost front end lowering job. Running W springs on a D drops the front end roughly 3 inches.
Are you sure of this? :thinking
John
Pretty sure, since you are one of the guys who stated it in here over the last 11 years. I'd have to hunt back through the suspension and 4wd threads to find it.
If I didn't build it, it ain't mine.

1949 Dodge B1B-108; 1969 D100-128; 72 Super Beetle; and a bunch of others...

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14573
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: truck stance

Post by Hobcobble »

WD wrote: Pretty sure, since you are one of the guys who stated it in here over the last 11 years. I'd have to hunt back through the suspension and 4wd threads to find it.
Hmmm..... I don't remember posting this, as I'm not positive myself. :thinking
Now you've got me wondering who I might have answered on this. :pale :lol: I do have a
pair of W200 front springs now and I can measure the bow distance vs the springs
currently on my D200 easy enough.... :idea
John

User avatar
mopardwh
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 4356
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
City: Longview
State: TX
Location: Back in the U.S.
Contact:

Re: truck stance

Post by mopardwh »

It does sound familiar, as many members have mentioned "lowering a D truck" by using w series leafs. So in this case it works opposite?
Doug

User avatar
riffraff
Sweptline.ORG Member
Sweptline.ORG Member
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 12:16 am
City: Newport Beach
State: CA

Re: truck stance

Post by riffraff »

I just pulled a set of 1969 W100 springs off my truck for replacement.

Up for grabs; local pick up only. Costa Mesa, CA. Gotta take both front and rears. Going to the scrappers soon...
Tom
1969 W100 383/435

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14573
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: truck stance

Post by Hobcobble »

I measured the distance from the bottom of the spring pack to the underside of the
truck frame on a D200 and W200. The distance is ~6 3/4" on the D and ~8 1/2" on
the W. :study :2cents
John

PwrWgnDrvr
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 7370
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Re: truck stance

Post by PwrWgnDrvr »

Hobcobble wrote:I measured the distance from the bottom of the spring pack to the underside of the
truck frame on a D200 and W200. The distance is ~6 3/4" on the D and ~8 1/2" on
the W. :study :2cents
John
What yr are those springs from?

User avatar
Hobcobble
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator
Posts: 14573
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Lockport, NY

Re: truck stance

Post by Hobcobble »

PwrWgnDrvr wrote:
Hobcobble wrote:I measured the distance from the bottom of the spring pack to the underside of the
truck frame on a D200 and W200. The distance is ~6 3/4" on the D and ~8 1/2" on
the W. :study :2cents
John
What yr are those springs from?
Terry,
The D200 is a '61
The W200 are mid '65 and '68. :study :Thumbsup
John

User avatar
soopernaut
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 8931
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Des Moines,IA

Re: truck stance

Post by soopernaut »

Could D100 springs be taller than D200 springs? It seems unlikely, but then again it seems unlikely for D springs to be taller than W springs.

PwrWgnDrvr
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Sweptline.ORG Pioneer
Posts: 7370
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Location: Walnut Creek, CA

Re: truck stance

Post by PwrWgnDrvr »

John, 69-71 W springs are flatter and lower. See the post way up in this topic. 68 and earlier are much taller and your measurements are congruent with that.

Post Reply